cannot be ruled out altogether. Tripoli was one other North African `post' which the Emperor wished to see revitalized, and this was a golden opportunity inadvertently presenting itself in support of Charles's policy. Roberto Valentini attributes the idea of including Tripoli in the deal with the Order to the Sicilian Viceroy, refering to it explicitly on two separate occasions (`dietro consiglio del Viceré di Sicilia' and `dietro le insistenze del Pignatelli'), but without citing supporting evidence on either.

  It was at this stage _ towards the end of June 1524 _ that a Commission, representative of the eight Langues, was entrusted to visit each of the three `posts' collectively on offer and to report back to the Venerable Council. The Order needed time to assess Charles V's magnanimity in the form it had now assumed, to evaluate it, to reflect and to resolve. The instructions these Hospitallers received and the report they subsequently drew up are widely known to those familiar with the history of the Order at this stage in its evolution and need not be repeated here.15 Quintessentially the Order was advised to accept Malta and Gozo but to decline the offer of Tripoli, as this was too isolated and too dangerously exposed to the assaults of the Barbaresques. Its walls were weak and could not withstand any artillery attacks. To rebuild them and the fortress was costly and would take long. History is full of ironies, and the Commission's strong recommendation to reject Tripoli was definitely one such. For when the Order eventually found itself on Malta, it was to this same fortress city of Tripoli that in 1548 the future Grandmaster Jean de la Valette, then Governor of Tripoli, had succeeded in convincing the Chapter General to have the Convent transferred the North African `post'. The project failed to materialize simply because the Ottoman armada had captured the city in August 1551.16

   Delaying tactics ?

   Following the submission of the Commission's report and their recommendations, negotiations over the cession ground rapidly to an

almost complete halt. Was there any viable alternative to Charles V's offer ? It would appear that it was in reaction to the stalemate that l'Isle Adam begins to contemplate the reconquest of Rhodes. Is there solid evidence of any serious talk about it earlier than 1525. Hadrian VI is at times mentioned within the context of a proposed counter-expedition. If this is correct, what real progress had been registered by 14 September 1523 when the pope died ? l'Isle Adam proceeded personally to Charles V's court in Spain for his support and in search for the necessary funds to subsidize the campaign. Almost simultaneously, on 20 May 1525, the Emperor despatched Don Pietro Fernandez d'Eredia to the Hospitaller Convent at Viterbo, where, since December 1523 (when Clement VII established them there), the Order had had its magistral palace, a conventual church, a hospital, and the auberges for the Langues. Charles's envoy indicated in a sense the Emperor's eagerness to reactivate an offensive policy for his otherwise idle and passive Mediterranean posts. The Spanish appear to be pressed for time. On the other hand, was the Grandmaster's idea of reconquering Rhodes _ plausible though this might very well have been, and indeed to all appearances politically legitimate and correct _ part of his delaying tactics in the hope of not reaching a definite resolution before the outcome of the war in Italy might very well mitigate Charles's conditions? But then time was not in the Order's favour, either. If from April 1525 through 1526, the Order was deeply involved in a Europe-wide fund-raising campaign for the Rhodian enterprise, it was as frantically endeavouring to observe and maintain absolute neutrality and to be seen doing strictly so by the warring kings and princes and their respective allies. In February 1525, Francis I had fallen captive to the imperial forces at Pavia, while `the better part of the French chivalry,' says G.R.Elton,17 `lay dead.' After a year's imprisonment, he was forced to sign the treaty of Madrid (14 January 1526), promising (among


[15] For the instructions, Bosio, iii, passim; for an English version of the eight commissioners' report, L. de Boisgelin, Ancient and Modern Malta, ii (London 1804), 15-18.
[16] See V. Mallia-Milanes, `Fra' Jean de la Valette 1495-1568 - A Reappraisal', in The Maltese Cross, ed.T. Cortis (Malta [1995]), 117-29. .
[17]
Elton, Reformation Europe.

pagina precedente / back to previous page
indice / back to summary
pagina successiva / next page