(Rivista Internazionale - December 1998: An epochal turning point - 3/5)
The Order’s sovereignty lies in its diplomatic recognition, in the consensus the international community gives to its mission, over and above its territory, over and above its population; and over and above the idea - now out-of-date - that, for there to be a Sovereign State, there has to be a government, a population and a territory. Otherwise there would be trouble, there would be trouble if the Order decided to give up the vanity of occupying or holding in sovereignty a strip of land ceded it by a State. It would be running a great risk. Because it would never be an effective sovereignty, but a sovereignty dependent on a local government, entrusted to the whims of the ruling classes, which can change over time. With the further risk that, if problems should arise in the relations between the State from which the territory has been obtained and the Order, the Order could once again be without territory, as in the times of Napoleon.
Before concluding this general discourse I would like to highlight two, more modest, arguments. The first is the strengthening of the Order’s international structure. The Order, through its various stages, has managed to give itself a new international quality. We have to thank our Hospitaller, who first arranged the international meeting of Hospitallers. But there is also the establishment of a Co-ordination Centre in Miami and our diplomatic mission to the United Nations in New York. There could be a documentation centre in this mission which, among other things, would be very useful in our fight against the Bogus Orders.
The Holy See has recently given a sign of great friendship on this matter, publishing a communication of ours which specified the exclusive legitimacy of the Order of Malta. The Communication Secretariat has given it the maximum circulation. We have also notified our ambassadors to the various countries as well as our mission to the United Nations so it can be transmitted to all the members of the General Assembly. I ask the Communication Delegates to make good use of it whenever necessary. I add that this communication was drawn up in the respect of the four Orders which are not bogus, that is, the Johanniter Order, the Most Venerable Order of Saint John, the Johanniterorden I Sverige and the Johanniterordern in Nederland cited in the note to the United Nations. |