to the authority of the State',(5) however increasingly inflexible Hospitaller Government was allowed to develop. The riots or upheavals in the form of public protests that occasionally occurred at remote intervals during the Hospitaller period on Malta were not loud manifestations against the complex affiliations with the 'alien' world outside and of which economic and social life on the island was the direct beneficiary; they were invariably expressions of anger and resentment provoked by the autocratic style of Hospitaller government.
   At its most simple, the islanders' 'acceptance' of this new Hospitaller experience - whether through what gradually grew into a 'positive sense of common interest with the ... State, or through inability to conceive of a [better] alternative' - made durability of the process possible.(6) The consequence of succumbing to the novel lure of lucrative adventure dramatically unsettled, indeed uprooted, one way of life, in all its cultural, social, economic, and institutional dimensions, to have it gradually substituted by what was thought to have been a more promising one. And if the historian is allowed to interpret the often indecipherable hidden motives behind the actions of the common man, then I would not hesitate to read in this flow of people a perhaps unconscious sense of discontent, conveniently and resoundingly challenging the archaism and insecurity of their late medieval insular confinement, indeed their traditional sacred reverence to the soil - an expression of dissatisfaction with the past. It was a response to pressing Hospitaller demands for necessities and luxuries in a land of poverty, a response initially inspired by the islanders' basic requirements - first to eat and then to eat better, first to work and then to get paid regularly, until higher and nobler aspirations began to dwarf material ends.
   In the long perspective of Malta's historical development, the Hospitallers constituted an irresistible force of 'integrative reality', Europeanizing Malta not only by their long presence on the island, but by unwittingly releasing 'liberating energies' within all sectors of society. The stream of 'nomadic freedom', of people moving from as far North as the Baltic Sea 'to the shores and harbours' of Malta for the exchange
of merchandise and other trade purposes, and vice versa, struck the attention of Mgr Angelo Durini, Inquisitor and Apostolic Delegate, who in 1760 described the island as a prosperous meeting-place 'not of one people, but of several nations.' The number of foreign consulates set up on the island was a clear indication of the trend. In the course of the seventeenth century, at least fifteen foreign States, kingdoms, cities, or ports had a consular representative resident on Malta to look after the needs of his fellow countrymen. It was an international conglomeration of sea-faring folk, hailing from England, Belgium, France, and Spain; others from Venice, Tuscany, Genoa, Naples, and Sicily; and others still from Armenia, the Greek islands, Syria, Dalmatia, and Egypt. New consulates were again set up in the eighteenth century for Dutch, Ragusan, Sardinian, Corsican, Hungarian, and American traders conducting business with or through the central Mediterranean island. Added to these were other centres (like the Barbary Regencies and Constantinople) whose merchandise was directed to the Grand Harbour under the protection of a foreign flag, very often French. Moreover, significant numbers of foreign merchants in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries sought 'naturalization' in Malta to be able to set up business concerns on the island, requesting the privilegio nazionale to qualify for preferential treatment. The same may be said of Maltese consuls settled in foreign ports.
   Without denying 'the persistent continuities of long traditions',(7) this silent forgotten revolution, as Braudel would call it, constituted in itself a movement away from most of what late medieval Malta stood for. During their long sojourn on the island, the Hospitallers had provided the more daring and adventurous sectors of the population with ample opportunity of transcending the restraints of insular limits. Indeed, this 'optimistic mobility', ironically generated by one of the most conservative monastic orders of the Church, marked a more radical transformation which may well be defined, to use Dirk Hoerder's expression, (8) as the 'secularization of hope', which the same historian explains as the islanders' general 'aspiration for improvement in this life rather than in the next'.(9)

[5] Ibid., 395.
[6] D.K. Fieldhouse, The Colonial Empires: A Comparative Survey from the Eighteenth Century (1965; rept. Houndmills, Macmillan 1991), 103.
[7] See, for example, L. Butler, 'The Maltese People and the Order of St John', Annales de l'Ordre Souverain Militaire de Malte, xxiii-xxiv (1965-66).
[8] D. Hoerder, 'Migration in the Atlantic Economies: Regional European Origins and Worldwide Expansion', in European Migrants: Global and Local Perspectives, ed. Dirk Hoerder and Leslie Page Moch (Boston, Northeastern University Press, 1996), 21-51.
[9] Ibid.
pagina precedente / back to previous page
indice / back to summary
pagina successiva / next page